Blog

Tips for Novice Models & Hopefuls

 (Aaron J. Fahrmann)

Working with a Photographer on your Portfolio Development or Portrait Session

I started my life as a photographer, but also tried my chops at modeling to see what life was like on the other side of the camera.  I went through the portfolio development process, worked as an extra, stand-in, and occasionally as a model.  It was an eye-opening experience that ultimately helped me to become a better portrait and fashion photographer.  I learned a lot of lessons the hard way—I will attempt to spare you the same, but keep in mind every person’s experience may differ.

I found the modeling experience well-worthwhile in learning what those I photograph can expect.  I will share what I have learned personally and professionally from my experience photographing practiced, professional, and novice models.

The information in this article can be helpful for a variety of people including those wanting fashion-y portraits, senior portraits, professional portraits, and of course, model-hopefuls.

Research Fashion, Practice, Practice, Practice and then Bring It

The best photographic results come from a seasoned, creative, working model who knows their photographic angles, poses and facial expressions by muscle memory.  The next best results come from a  well-practiced, and devoted model-hopeful—the operative words here are “well-practiced.”

First, look at magazines in your field of interest to see what other models facial expressions and body postures look like—this will give you some ideas of what types of images the editors have selected from the myriad of shots taken for that particular spread in their publication.  Current magazines will show you what the top talents in your field-of-interest are doing.

Second, experiment with which looks work best for your angles and features and practice them.  While I, as your photographer, can provide some guidance, I encourage model-hopefuls to practice a variety of looks and flattering angles in a mirror well in advance of the photo session.  This is actually important for portrait and senior portrait clients as well.

When you feel ready, schedule the photo session and come prepared to maximize your investment.  Practice, and lots of it, can create confidence and remove a lot of one’s unexpected fear from a situation most aren’t faced with very often—being professionally photographed.

Having someone’s attention intensively focused on you as the subject of a photograph can often be uncomfortable—especially since the photographer’s eye is behind the lens (no eye contact.)  This discomfort can be made even worse if you are in-studio with a bunch of strobe lights pointed at you.  Many novice models have a “deer in the headlights look” when they were expecting to be fully comfortable in front of the camera.

The photographer make suggestions, but if you don’t know how your face or body feel in a certain poses, then its that much harder to strike them successfully and move fluidly between shots.  Some of this body-kinesthetic knowledge will only come from experience and feedback from photographers, but one can make an excellent start using the aforementioned practice in a mirror.  Knowing your body and face well can also make it easier for the photographer to guide you toward new and interesting poses you might not have practiced.

At this starting point in your career, while you may not be experienced in front of the camera, you certainly can be well-practiced.  Concentrated practice before the shoot will do wonders for your confidence and can make the shot success rate go way up.  Then, once you have had your first photo shoot, you will be that much clearer on your comfort working as a model while the photographer follows your movements with a camera.

I have photographed many unprepared models—even experienced professionals.  The ones that I hired back were the ones who made my work more fun by being energetic, professional, genuine, cordial, and most of all—prepared.  Photographers love their work—any model that makes their work drudgery is unlikely to be hired in the future.

The Photographer/Model Relationship

Even though you are paying photographers during portfolio development, you need to treat them as if they are your clients—it is possible that the photographer you hire for portfolio development photographs will have other friends or clients for whom you may be the perfect fit.  If you want to be top-of-mind when such an opportunity arises, then treat every session professionally. Photographers often have a lot of say in who is hired and who is photographed.  For example, when I was a staff photographer for a catalog retailer, I was often the only person, or one of a small group of people, making the model hiring decisions.

Testing—See if you are Photogenic First

Model-esque features are rarely enough to make one into a model.  The camera has to love you—and you might be surprised who the camera loves and who it doesn’t.

The most beautiful person in the three-dimensional world may not be photogenic.  The camera in the hands of a knowledgeable professional is a tool that translates the three-dimensional world into two-dimensions—which is unkind to some people and complimentary to others.  Great photographers can find those best angles—skill and knowledge of the photographer dictates a lot of this, but there are elements that are out of the photographer’s control and at the mercy of optical physics.

If you haven’t been professionally photographed by a fashion photographer, it is recommended that you start out with a Model Test Session  to determine if you are photogenic and comfortable being in front of the camera (see my price list on my website, or if for some reason its not there, then email me.)  Comfort in front of the camera can be learned over time and will often happen naturally during portfolio development.

Preliminary testing is a way to discover if one is photogenic without blowing a bunch of money on creating a portfolio of images when this may not be a good career fit. Once one has a good headshot and full-length photograph, send them to some reputable modeling agencies.  If modeling is a good fit, then one can continue to invest more money in portfolio development.  If it’s not a good fit, then one at least has some nice photos of oneself, created for a minimal investment.

Self-confidence and Modeling

Emotions in general, including self-confidence, translate readily to the two-dimensions of a photograph—this is part of the reason images with people can have so much power and communicate beyond their subject matter.  This is also the reason self-confidence is important for modeling.

Everyone has some level of insecurity, but in modeling, one needs to be confident in who they are as a person.  This doesn’t mean one should be narcissistic, rude, or aloof.  The best qualities in any person, in my opinion, are an ego-less self-confidence and genuine kindness.

Modeling is an industry where it is easy to internalize criticism.  Learn to deal with criticism constructively.  One will get a lot of unsolicited feedback—listen without judgment, learn something from it, and move forward from that point.  In every experience lies some type of lesson and an opportunity for growth.

Photographic Submissions for Modeling Agencies

Most modeling agencies want to see professional photographs of you prior to agreeing to represent you.  Snapshots are sometimes OK, but they’re rarely truly flattering nor provide a good representation of the model’s full potential under professional photography circumstances.

Even though agencies will sometimes accept family photos and holiday snaps, it can put you at a disadvantage against your competition.  Reputable agencies receive thousands of photos and some, tens of thousands.  It’s best to submit something professional to increase your chance making it through the screening process and on to potential representation.  Many agencies only accept resubmissions every six months, so make your first submission memorable.  Check the individual agency websites to see their specific submission requirements.  Often, you will be asked to provide some personal information such as height, weight, eye color, etc.

Do your research, though, to make sure you are comfortable with the agency with which you are signing—especially if they want you to sign an exclusive contract.  The best research comes from talking with many other professional working models in your local market and taking an average of their opinions about which agencies are best.

Types of Modeling

There are as many ways to make money as a model as there are products and services being advertised.  There are jobs for a wide variety, shape, and size of models in catalogs, commercials, and beyond.  There are product models, fashion models, face models, hand models, and athletic models—the list is as long as is the variety of products offered and advertisers’ needs.  You may dream of making a living in any one of these fields—and one can potentially make an honest living in all of them.  The variety of those who model is equal to the diversity of the planets inhabitants itself.

Being charismatic, self-confident, professional and photogenic are very important factors in becoming a successful model, in my humble opinion.  Success can be at a local level or at an international level-it all depends on what the best market fit for one’s particular look becomes.

Two areas of my specialization, namely fashion and lifestyle imagery, still have height requirements while many other requirements have changed.  It seems that 5’9” is often the cut-off for working fashion and commercial models.  Everyone of course knows there are exceptions to this rule, but they are very, very, rare indeed. I have worked with only two professional models whose height was below this mark.  Television and video have different requirements.

Money, Money, Money—Developing your First Portfolio

Like any business, professional modeling requires an upfront investment.  Expect to pay the photographer to photograph you and expect to pay some model agencies to be listed in their print books especially when you are just starting out.  Some agencies have moved away from print books to online directories.

It is the rare model that doesn’t pay for most, if not all of their first professional portfolio photographs—a very rare model indeed—think supermodel rare.  While you might be the next supermodel, don’t expect experienced photographers to shoot your portfolio images for free if you are not already well established —and even then it is often only if the photographer approaches you first.

If a photographer approaches you, be flattered, but keep it in perspective if they are not a working professional.  Some photographers build-up their book (portfolio) by shooting models for free when they are just starting out.  This means one becomes the amateur photographer’s guinea pig, so the results can sometimes be less than spectacular with a shot success rate that’s very low.  If an established professional wants to photograph you, then you might give it more credence.  A good screening device is to ask to see the photographer’s fashion, portrait, or model portfolio.  If you like what you see, then hire them.

When developing one’s first portfolio, be prepared to shoot with at least 3-5 different established photographers.  Agencies like to see a variety of images in a portfolio that show diversity of angles, themes, and looks, so choose looks wisely with an eye toward one’s market of interest.  Be open to all reputable jobs in the beginning—building a work resume is important in the beginning.

Modeling Schools

My personal opinion is that one shouldn’t pay for model training or modeling school—I have seen the results—while there are always exceptions, in my opinion and experience the results of model school attendance often do more harm than good.

Modeling is very specific to the model.  It’s dynamic and subject to current trends.  It changes faster than a school can teach it and is more a function of personal creativity, practice, and experience in front of the camera.

The Established Model

Once you are well established as a model, then the money outlays change a bit.  An established model has the option of using “tear-sheets,” or prints/duplicates of the work they have actually performed for a client.  A model for a perfume advertisement might ask the client and photographer if she/he can use one of the images in her/his portfolio (generally only allowed once the advertising campaign starts running or has finished its run.)  Even professional models, however may choose to do some contract photography with a favorite photographer to enhance an area of their portfolio that might be lacking.

If you have modeling experience, you may want to refresh or expand your portfolio every six months to a year by shooting with a professional fashion photographer.  If you like a particular photographer’s style or want to work in an industry the photographer is known for shooting, then contact them for a session.  You can expand the look of your portfolio and maybe work into a new industry specialization or niche.

For some models in some industries, new photos will be necessary when their look changes dramatically.  Shooting with a variety of photographers means that your book will show diversity in style and that you can work with a range of different professionals.  It also keeps your book fresh—showing agencies and prospective clients that you are serious about modeling.  If an agency offers a print book or online directory, they may request a new images from you, often once per year.

The final tip is to be gracious and thankful to all you meet and to those who help you.  Be thankful for all successes, no matter how small.  Leave your ego out of all interactions.  It will make a world of difference by reducing work for everyone involved.  You may be a model, but you are also a salesperson, and ultimately a person.

 

 

Disclaimer:  The tips in this article are the opinions of Aaron Fahrmann Photography and in no way are to be construed as a guarantee of any model’s personal, financial, or business success.  The information in this article is provided without any warrantees or guarantees whatsoever.

Get updates from my Artists Page

Buckled ice traverses the frame of this photograph.  It has partially melted and refrozen which filled in the crack. (Aaron J. Fahrmann)

Buckled ice traverses the frame of this photograph. It has partially melted and refrozen which filled in the crack.

I post new photos and new galleries to my Artist’s Page, so if you are interested in what’s new, feel free to “Like” it for updates.  If you prefer to Tweet, then:  @aaronfahrmann.

Camera Selection for European and City Travel

A small castle in the Bretagne region of France

“I am leaving for a Estonia tomorrow and I need a camera that will allow me to shoot some sights—I am looking to spend about $300.00 and I want to make some great photos on this trip.”  This is actually a paraphrase more than a direct quote, but you would be surprised at the number of times I have heard it with varying destinations inserted.

I worked for a camera store—many, many, years ago.  Customers would come into the store moments before leaving for a trip to somewhere wonderful, fist filled with cash, and want a camera that will help them save some trip memories.  I would offer to be their personal documentary photographer, but of course THEY wanted to know some basics about cameras for the travel rather than try to stow me away—the nerve.

Whenever possible, buy a camera well before your trip.  Even with 24 years photography experience, I have lost several great shots on vacation due to bizarre, unexpected, and easily resolvable technical difficulties experienced with an unfamiliar camera.    I generally recommend owning and using a camera for several months before taking it on a trip—even longer if you are using an SLR (Single Lens Reflex.)

Learning a new camera’s functions at a critical photo-making time can be particularly frustrating.  You have invested a lot of money in airline tickets and hotels, why ruin your memories of the Eiffel Tower by fiddling with your camera when it unexpectedly refuses to make an image, fire a flash, or any of the many other bizarre things that can go wrong.  Sometimes just the placement of the buttons and knobs on a new camera can be the problem.  Landing in a new country or destination will provide you with several more pressing challenges with which to contend.

If for some reason you are going to buy a camera last minute, then at the very least spend several dedicated hours, days, or weeks shooting test images around your home town—take photos of buildings, people, and sights to prepare for your camera’s debut in your vacation destination.   This can help you deal with the camera quirks that are generally not advertised by the camera companies.

Both digital and film cameras can have bizarre power and lighting situations arise when on location.  A little experimentation will help one know: How long will a battery last per charge, how many shots can I take, does the flash eat up the battery super fast, how many shots do I really get on a memory card, and will the camera accidentally turn on if I put it in my pocket the wrong way.  All of these are valid concerns and can make or break a day or more of touristy vacation fun.

Important Accessories

Buy a second rechargeable battery and several mid-sized memory cards to go with your camera—it will be expensive but well worth the extra $100-150.00.  Vacations are notorious for making one forget to charge one’s camera battery or download memory cards each night.  Back-up batteries and extra cards provide the insurance of having at least one extra day of photographing between lapses in memory.  Plus, if you have several moderate sized memory cards instead of one large one, you are better protected against a data failure or card loss.  I generally prefer the SanDisk products.

Memory Card Availability

Before buying a camera, take into consideration the ability to get a memory card for it on the road.  If you are traveling in large cities, then this won’t usually be a problem, but if you are traveling elsewhere, then obscure memory cards may be hard to find.  There are two common types of memory cards that have become industry standards:  SD (or HDSD) and Compact Flash (CF.)  Compact flash cards are generally used in higher end digital SLR cameras.  SD/HDSD are used in virtually every other type of compact camera, but not all.  There are a few brands that use a brand-specific type of memory card—avoid these.  You might be surprised that you need more image memory on the road than you had originally budgeted.   I found this out on a trip to Chicago.  I was shooting for the day and ran out of memory mid afternoon.  I looked around my location, found a nearby drugstore, bought some more memory and continued shooting without much interruption to my trip.  If I needed a bizarre memory card type, I would have been out of luck—the drug store only carried SD cards.

Backing-up Images on Your Trip

Use some means of backing up your images.  One idea is to have doubles of each image printed at a local photo store each night and send the second set of prints home via the post semi-regularly.  Another option is to use a new memory card each day (or two) and back it up to a personal assistant or other backup device.  Keep the cards in a safe location and don’t erase the cards.  The best and most reliable option is to make two backups that you keep with you on the trip, and have an additional backup that you make to a secure online website each night.  This may seem like overkill, and it may be, but it depends on how important the images of your trip are to you.

I generally keep my memory cards and one backup with me.  Once the cards are used up, I either buy more, do some impromptu on the road editing on the cards (after backup to a hard drive and online) or handle the cards like they are gold.   One backup is great, two including online backups are better.

Postcards in Lieu of Photography

If you are a world-renowned, bad photographer—compositionally challenged, don’t understand lighting, or just don’t wish to carry a camera with you, then postcards are a great way to acquire a nice photographic record of a location.  While it may not be particularly personal to your experience, it can provide you with professional images from a vacation haven, and it gives you a bit of space on the back to write a few notes and recollections for your memoirs.  You can add a few snaps of you and your friends to fill in the personalization gaps.  This solution is also a great fill-in on day three of your vacation when you forget to charge your camera batteries and download your images.

Even with my long photographic history and training, I would often buy postcards when I wasn’t in a location long enough to make the carefully crafted image I envisioned.  Unless one is on a paid assignment, waiting for the right time of year or right lighting conditions can really make a dent in your leisure travel itinerary.

Chances are, if you are not going to be in a place for a long period of time and don’t have a lot of photographic experience, you are not going to get as nice a photograph as the professionals who live in-situ year-round.  They have the luxury to wait for the right lighting and weather conditions and the understanding to know when and how to photograph it for maximum effect.

The extra benefit is that one can support professional photographers who work very hard to create memorable images for the postcards.  This is, however, a photography blog, so, enough said on that subject.  Let’s move on to what features to look for in the purchase of a travel camera.

Camera Lens Recommendations for the Traveler with Few Photographic Skills

Most urban travelers want to make photographs of historic building interiors and exteriors, cityscapes, self and companion portraits and other points of historic interest while on their trips.  Among these images will be the photographs of oneself in a place of interest.  It is for these reasons that I recommend a camera with a 24mm or more commonly a 28mm lens (based on 35mm film format camera) or its digital equivalent.  The 28mm lens is a comfortably-wide angle lens that will allow you to hand-hold the camera while pointing it in toward yourself and a companion without having to hand it to a stranger.  Practice this technique a bit before you leave on your trip and you will quickly master it.  It gives a very distinct style of imagery that can be very personal and make for a great tradition.  It is however hard to get a lot of background detail in the shot with this technique.  If your camera can provide fill flash, this would be one time to use it.  Digital cameras now give one the luxury to gauge self-portrait successes on the LCD screen.

A 24mm or 28mm lens is versatile enough to accommodate photographs of building interiors and exteriors and most general needs of the vacation traveler.  Many of the less expensive point and shoot cameras come with a built-in 35 or 38mm focal length (equivalent) lens which is considered slightly wide angle.  This will often be too narrow for most urban travelers needs especially in areas with narrow streets as in many European countries.  Focal lengths of 35mm are great for family photos, and incidentally, person-oriented street photography, but will probably be frustrating when vacationing.

A bit about lens focal lengths

The 50mm focal length based on the 35mm film format (or its digital equivalent) in photographic parlance is considered a “normal” focal length which provides about the equivalent proportions one’s eyes would see, but a much more cropped version of it.  It will provide a similar perspective view to what your eye might see with blinders on at about 10-15 feet.

The human eye is an amazing bit of functional evolution in that they are super wide-angle stereo lenses that can quickly adapt to light changes, yet provide us with a normal, undistorted look to the world—no human designed camera lens has been able to duplicate its sophistication.  To be fair, though, we have large, complex brains which aid our eyes in doing their feats of impressive image creation and interpretation.  The language of photography and the camera is different from what one sees, which in part, is what makes it an interesting art form.  The camera translates images from three dimensions to two with the unique glass and plastic lens limitations.  One’s eyes interpret three dimensions in a manner concordant with our experience.

To further confuse things, people will talk about 35mm both as a focal length of a lens or as reference to the film used.  To make things even more convoluted, digital point and shoot cameras lenses are often converted into 35mm film equivalencies since digital cameras often have focal lengths in the 4mm+ range.  The pros are at fault for maintaining the 35mm film camera conversion standard, but it was needed and the long existing one designed around the tradition of film seemed appropriate.  It is the only standard presently applied to digital cameras.

Wide Angle vs. Telephoto

Any lens focal length that is numerically smaller in value than the 50mm normal lens, i.e., 24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 38mm is considered wide angle and provides broad coverage of a scene.  A wide angle lens allows one to gather more information from a place on the film plane or digital sensor.  Anything numerically higher than the 50mm normal lens (70mm, 105mm, 300mm, etc.) is considered telephoto and provides a magnified perspective relative to what one’s unaided eye sees.  For tall buildings, sculptures and church spires, most people will be happy with a 24mm or 28mm lens.  If you go much wider than this, you may find too much visual information crammed into your photograph, plus you will pay a lot more money for the privilege.  Some architecture will require 12-15mm lenses, but unless you are an advanced amateur or a pro, save yourself the expense and weight and buy a postcard of the building.  Wider than 28mm is the point at which lens distortion becomes more pronounced even on the most expensive camera lenses.  Many point and shoot cameras for sale generally have a zoom range of about 24-70mm, 28-140mm or 35mm to 210mm.  Some of the cameras have auxiliary lenses that can be purchased to go wider.  The 28-140mm zoom range is wide enough for most travelers and telephoto enough for any more specific applications one might have.  Most tourists will be satisfied with a camera that has a zoom range from 28-105mm.

Re-evolution: From Commercial Product Photography back to Artistry

Abstraction of an industrial business' shipping palette and container storage facility (Aaron J. Fahrmann)

By Aaron Fahrmann

The city of Minneapolis is blessed by several inner city lakes that link together though several paths and roadways. I have lived near, and enjoyed several of them. Lake Calhoun, Lake of the Isles, and Lake Harriet have all received my interest, but Lake Nokomis has garnered my most intense attentions.

Lake Nokomis is one of several intercity lakes in Minneapolis, and the subject of one of my long, passionate, and consuming photography projects. I moved near Lake Nokomis several years ago in a bid to stay in the city, but get out of the tight inner ring of Minneapolis. Uptown and downtown are great, but I had changed my ideas of what I wanted. Since then, South Minneapolis, and in particular, Lake Nokomis has been my home for exercise, relaxation, and of course—photography.

I have lived near Lake Nokomis since 1999, but didn’t really start photographing the lake until 2001 when I was laid off from my staff job as a catalog photographer. I soon returned to freelance photography, working for several large studios in town, but later decided it might be a good time to go back to school to finish my long-delayed undergraduate degree.

When I reentered the University, I primarily needed upper division fine art course work to complete my degree. I didn’t have any of the prerequisites for advanced upper division work in other artistic disciplines at the time, so I had to take photography courses.

Commercial freelance product photography work had turned me into a photographic technician more than creative photographer, which possibly burned me out at the same time. It’s the price one pays for earning a living as a freelance and catalog photographer. Freelancers tend to get the shooting jobs that the studio staffers generally don’t want. I had mad photography and lighting skills, but most everything I was assigned to shoot were products placed on a white background. This was part of the reason I took a staff job even at a significant decrease in pay—I thought I could shoot some of the cool stuff.

While I had a lot of photographic passion when I returned to school, I no longer had the same creativity-enhancing angst associated with one’s teens and early twenties—I was generally happy and at peace with the world.

It had been a long time since I embraced a photography project solely for creativity’s sake without a product or an art director driving the process. My first few fine art projects in my collegiate return were desperate attempts to create interesting and meaningful work, but there was much floundering—I didn’t realize that I needed to re-artify my brain. I kept trying to find inspiration in weird cameras and retro technology rather than the core assessments and enactment of ideas.

These unforeseen issues created a high degree of frustration for both myself and one of my early photography instructors upon my return to school. I needed to be in the class for more than the technical completion of my degree—I needed to realign my brain, but my instructor apparently thought I was just overqualified for the course, even asking me with intensity why I had taken it. In reality, I needed it to graduate under University rules and some unfortunate registration timing, but I also needed it to get back to being an artist.

I thought that working commercially wouldn’t affect my artistry, but it really had stifled it. Shooting everything on white in a production style (photography driven by numbers of items shot per day) can take its toll. Commercial photography, when done right, certainly can function as art and embrace creativity, but the majority of product catalog work is really uninspired and mechanical. I should have sought out clothing catalog work, but there really is very little fashion catalog shooting done in the already over-saturated Twin Cities market.

I was frustrated with myself. My instructor (this was the first class I had ever had with him) seemed to be equally frustrated. I would guess he held the presumption that I might be just after an easy “A” in the class. He even said that he didn’t know what he could teach me, to which I replied that I wasn’t sure either—the difference was, however, that I really wasn’t sure, but I kept hoping that he knew or that I might find out. Hindsight is truly valuable. I love learning, but sometimes the process has to be gradual and frustrating for it to create its core value. This frustration successfully replaced the missing angst as a driver of creative process.

It wasn’t until my second upper division course in photography with a professor with whom I had studied many years before, that I returned to my artistic photographic roots. I did some floundering in this class as well, but finally made a breakthrough near the end of the class. I was in the midst of a portrait project, of which my instructor was supportive, but reserved. I was doing the work, and it was more creatively inspired than that of the previous upper division photography course, but it was still mostly about interesting technique. I was getting great results, but there was no deep creative thinking or explorations—just interesting image making.

My project was due, and I wasn’t feeling it. As hard as I had worked, it was not personally or artistically satisfying. It was after my seventh portrait session that I just stopped shooting. I needed to shoot something different. It was an eleventh hour change, but I decided to take the risk and use the several days remaining of the semester deadline to shoot an entirely different final project.

I chose to restart an industrial photography project that I had completed many years ago. This time, I shot in color instead of black and white. I acclimated myself to a nearby industrial park’s lighting schemes and optimal times of day. It was comfortable and it felt right. I walked into a new style of shooting—one that really said something and established a new manner of image creation for me.

Color added a whole new dimension to the industrial imagery. I approached the project intuitively. I shot more abstract, dimensionally flat, squared, and graphical—in essence creating flat geometric spaces out of tight three-dimensional industrial compositions. I was back in stride. It was a very intense, exhausting, and fulfilling span of time. I think in total, I probably shot about 500 images, of which I selected twenty to present to the class. I was back in my artistic head, even being compared by the instructor with a painter of whom I had never heard (at the time.) It was an apt comparison, though, as I have since discovered. A selection of the resulting photographs from this project can be found in a book/catalog that I compiled called “Industry, Revisited: 2003.” I also have some of the images for sale as prints on my website.

I was required to register for an additional final course as a type of undergraduate capstone to the studio arts degree. I asked my more familiar photography instructor to be my reviewer. I created a fine art hand bound book project representing my fine art work progress over the span of my two decade undergraduate art career. It was upon reviewing this book that my instructor stopped on an image I had made during my walks around Lake Nokomis. He looked at it for a long time, and then said, “this is interesting.”

His interest in my image was a catalyst in my devotion to Lake Nokomis as my next major photography project—one that would span many, many years. These images, while not all uploaded to my website, are partially represented in my book “City Lake: Images of Lake Nokomis.” I still have thousands of images that have yet to be uploaded, and for that matter, yet to be edited. It is a long process. For a period of time I was shooting about 1000 images per day of shooting, and probably have about 200,000 images to go through before I can consider the project complete.

Lake Nokomis continues to be a subject of photography for me to this day, however I no longer shoot 10,000-20,000 images per month. A small sampling of these images can be found under the “Bird and Waterfowl” and “City Lake: Images of Lake Nokomis” galleries on my website. “Industry, Revisited: 2003” imagery can also be seen under its corresponding gallery. The hard and soft cover books are available from Blurb—Just search for NokomisAman or hit the link.

I have since moved on to other project areas.  I have created an art-science room installation that explores and communicates my passion for, and theories within, the physical and temporal sciences. I created an additional photography project using street portraits to explore non-linear temporal networks.

One interesting side benefit of this personal re-creation and re-evolution is that my commercial photography has been strengthened by my more concentrated focus on fine art projects.

I-beam girder abstraction (Aaron J. Fahrmann)

I-beam girder abstraction

Watch this blog, and my other blogs for future project postings.